Mr. Trump,

Sir, I know you to be a thoughtful and intellectually honest person. I have read your books and have found them to be both knowledgeable and inspiring and it is by the projection that a reader of well written book takes away from the reading that I am compelled to reach out to you on the current controversy you have waded into.

You have and are making several profound errors in your approach on the subject of whether the current occupant of the Executive Office is or is not a ‘natural born Citizen’ as the Constitutional ‘prerequisite imperative’ demands.

The first FACT that you need to be aware of is that there is NO acknowledged “legal” definition of the Constitutional idiom of natural born Citizen.

Secondly, “native born” and “natural born” are not wholly synonymous for Constitutional purposes. The confusion is derived both from the inappropriate interpretations of the 14th Amendment and from the coordinated misinformation asserted by the “liberal-Progressive-Socialist-Communist-Open Borders-One World’er cabal that is no longer lurking in the shadows.

Returning to the 1st point it is important to note that when you understand the FACT that there is no acknowledged “legal” definition of the Constitutional idiom of natural born Citizen this “legal loop-hole” makes it obvious that the examination of any persons Birth Certificate an exercise in futility.

“Plausible deniability” attaches to any perceived defect in the birth circumstances and conditions to the extent that not even being foreign born to an underage mother who is a U.S. citizen is out of the umbrella of plausibility given the “considerations” provided by the S.R. 511 covering John McCain.

The trap and the possible damage you have stepped in is the possibility of providing cover for an OBVIOUS Dual-Citizen at birth individual should the pressure of media attention force the disclosure of a Bona Fide Birth Certificate that establishes birth in Hawaii.

Please consider that the Founders lived through a period of war with the enemy among them and Framed the Constitution in light of their experiences and their knowledge of world history and the various works said to be of the Age of Enlightenment, compendiums of the laws of nature and natures God as they concerned the affairs of men and nations.

You would be doing your-self and the Country a great service in expressing the FACT that there is NO acknowledged “legal” definition of the Constitutional idiom of natural born Citizen.

It is a “legally correct” statement and a bit of information that may wake the Country up by explaining how the Dual Citizen son of an Alien Foreign National British Colonial Kenyan Subject used a ‘legal loop-hole’ to assume the Office of POTUS by a De Facto act of Usurpation.

Respectfully,
Steven Lee Craig [ii]
slcraigre@aol.com
http://nbcfund.com

_______________________________________________
i] See Minor v Happersette [p168] (post 14th Amendment)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/h ... 62_ZO.html
ii] Has spent 2 ½ years seeking Certification as an American natural born Citizen though Federal Departments (FEC/DHS/USCIS) and Federal Courts; USDC W OK 09-343 / 11-1345 - USCA 10th 09-6082 / 11-9501 and at the SCOTUS 10-10817 and Pending new Petition for Original Jurisdiction